|
1.
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
T. Cartmell called the meeting to order at 9:32 a.m.
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
Moved
A. Paquette:
|
|
|
|
|
That the May 7, 2019, Urban Planning
Committe meeting agenda be adopted.
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
Moved
S. McKeen:
|
|
|
|
|
That
the April 23, 2019, Urban Planning Committee meeting minutes be adopted.
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor S. McKeen requested permission to make a motion
without notice to rescind a motion previously adopted.
|
|
|
|
Moved
A. Paquette:
|
|
|
|
|
That
Committee waive the rules on providing notice of motion as set out in section
32 of Bylaw 18155 - Council Procedures Bylaw to allow Councillor S.
McKeen to make a motion without notice to rescind a motion previously
adopted, at the April 23, 2019, Urban Planning Committee meeting.
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
|
Moved
S. McKeen:
|
|
|
|
|
|
That the following
motion, passed at the April 23, 2019, Urban Planning Committee meeting, be
rescinded:
Corporate Tree
Management Policy- Public Engagement
1. That Administration
conduct more extensive public engagement on the Corporate Tree Management
Policy
2. That Administration
draft amendments to:
·
Zoning Bylaw
12800
·
Policy C531
to include a special
provision for Natural Areas.
|
City Ops.
*Clerk’s note: A revised motion on this topic was passed during discussion
of item 6.3 at the April 30, 2019, City Council meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
were no protocol items.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following items were selected for debate: 6.1 and 6.2
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
Moved
S. McKeen:
|
|
|
|
|
That Urban Planning Committee hear
from the following speakers, in panels where appropriate:
6.1 Comprehensive Review of Parking Regulations in Zoning Bylaw
12800
- S.
Bond, Canadian Home Builders Association- Edmonton Region
- A.
Kodian, Canadian Home Builders Association- Edmonton Region
- D.
Peck, Canadian Home Builders Association- Edmonton Region
- N.
Carey
- M.
Graham, Infill Development in Edmonton Association
- K.
Goa, Infill Development in Edmonton Association
- A.
Salvador, YEGarden Suites
- A.
Pye, NAIOP Edmonton
- I.
O’Donnell, Business Improvement Area Council
- M.
Samji, Infill Development in Edmonton Association
- R.
Maggay, City of Edmonton Youth Council
- A.
Visweswaran, City of Edmonton Youth Council
- N.
Osorio
- K.
Ingraham
- E.
Solez
- W.
Rocholl
6.2 Development
Permit Inspection- Annual Report 2018 Results
·
D. Peck,
Canadian Home Builders Association- Edmonton Region
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
were no requests for any items to be dealt with at a specific time.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
|
There
were no Councillor Inquiries.
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
McCabe, Deputy City Manager, and A. Stevenson, Urban Form and Corporate
Strategic Development, made a presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bond, A. Kodian, and D. Peck,
Canadian Home Builders Association - Edmonton Region; N. Carey; M. Graham,
K. Goa and M. Samji, Infill Development in Edmonton Association; A. Salvador,
YEGarden Suites; A. Pye, NAIOP Edmonton; I. O'Donnell, Business Improvement
Area Council; R. Maggay and A. Visweswaran, City of Edmonton Youth Council;
N. Osoiro; K. Ingraham; E. Solez; and
W. Rocholl, made presentations. A. Kodian; D. Peck;
M. Graham; K. Goa; A. Pye; I. O'Donnell; M. Samji;
N. Osorio; K. Ingraham; and E. Solez, answered the Committee's questions.
|
|
|
|
|
A
handout provided by D. Peck was distributed to Members of the Committee and a
copy was filed with the Office of the City Clerk.
|
|
|
|
|
S.
McCabe, Deputy City Manager, A. Stevenson, L. Peter, P. Ohm, and D. Hales,
Urban Form and Corporate Strategic Development, answered the Committee's
questions.
|
|
|
|
Moved
T. Cartmell:
|
|
|
|
|
That Administration advance the
implementation of Approach 2 as described in the May 7, 2019, Urban Form and
Corporate Strategic Development report CR_6707 and return with a report to
Committee, including:
- A
comprehensive review of on-street parking implications
- Further
research to determine significant predictors of all types of parking
demand, and how these predictors affect on-site demand
- Development
of an implementation scenario, including draft bylaw amendments, that
considers a phased, transitional approach, and different zoning
categories (e.g. Downtown / core, commercial/industrial, core
residential, suburban residential, institutional, stadium area),
including the impact on each
- Implementation
of the other regulatory amendments as outlined in Attachment 6.
|
|
|
|
Amendment
moved D. Iveson:
|
|
|
|
|
That the third bullet be amended to
read as follows:
- Development of implementation
scenarios, including draft bylaw amendments, that consider a one-step implementation
and/or a phased, transitional approach, and different zoning categories
(e.g. downtown / core, commercial/industrial, core residential, suburban
residential, institutional, stadium area), including the impact on each.
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen
|
|
|
|
Opposed:
|
|
|
|
|
M.
Nickel
|
|
|
|
Motion,
as Amended, put:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open Option Parking
Implementation
That Administration
advance the implementation of Approach 2 as described in the May 7, 2019, Urban
Form and Corporate Strategic Development report CR_6707 and return with a report
to Committee, including:
·
A
comprehensive review of on-street parking implications
·
Further
research to determine significant predictors of all types of parking
demand, and how these predictors affect on-site demand
·
Development of
implementation scenarios, including draft bylaw amendments, that consider a
one-step implementation and/or a phased, transitional approach, and
different zoning categories (e.g. downtown / core, commercial/industrial,
core residential, suburban residential, institutional, stadium area),
including the impact on each
·
Implementation
of the other regulatory amendments as outlined in Attachment 6.
|
Urban Form and Corp.
Strategic Dev.
Due Date: Oct. 1, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
|
Moved
A. Paquette:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options for
Cash-in-Lieu of Parking
That Administration prepare a report that explores high level
policy options for:
·
Developer
payments in lieu of minimum parking requirements to contribute to public
transit, and/or
·
High
density parking that facilitates transit options in lieu of minimum parking
requirements, and provide a recommended option if applicable.
|
Urban Form and Corp.
Strategic Dev.
Due Date: Oct. 1, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
McCabe, Deputy City Manager, W.T. Ramirez, and
L.
Peter, Urban Form and Corporate Strategic Development, answered the
Committee's questions.
|
|
|
|
Moved
M. Nickel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
That the May 7, 2019,
Urban Form and Corporate Strategic Development Report CR_4715, be received
for information.
|
Urban Form and Corp.
Strategic Dev.
|
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
Moved
D. Iveson:
|
|
|
|
|
That
Urban Planning Committee recommend to City Council:
That Bylaw 18807 be given the appropriate readings.
|
|
|
|
In
Favour:
|
Carried
|
|
|
|
T.
Cartmell, A. Paquette, D. Iveson, S. McKeen, M. Nickel
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
T. Cartmell asked if there were any Notices of Motion. There were none.
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
|
|
The
meeting adjourned at 3:12 p.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|